Moroccan press rallies behind newspaper after record libel verdict
2008-03-31
In the wake of what many are calling an "exorbitant" penalty for libel, a diverse group of Moroccan newspapers is coming out in support of Al Massae daily. The papers say the decision threatens independent journalists and free speech.
By Sarah Touahri for Magharebia in Rabat – 31/03/08
![]() [ٍSarah Touahri] The Moroccan press and media watchdogs are voicing concerns over the 6-million dirham libel fine levied March 25th in Rabat against Al Massae daily newspaper. |
Both Moroccan press and media watchdogs are voicing concerns over the 6-million dirham libel fine levied March 25th in Rabat against Al Massae daily newspaper and its publishing director, Rachid Nini.
The ruling followed an article last November on a "gay wedding party" in the small northern Moroccan town of Ksar Al-Kébir, in which the publication claimed the town's "network of sexual perverts" included an unnamed deputy royal prosecutor. Despite apologies published by the paper, all four deputy royal prosecutors in Ksar El Kébir lodged individual complaints against Al Massae for defamation of character and libel.
The record fine levied against the largest-selling newspaper in Morocco, which has been in existence for less than a year, is a "clear message to the independent press as a whole", Al Massae’s editorial team said after the decision was rendered.
Many Moroccan newspapers noted that the ruling affects them as well. French-language Aujourd'hui Le Maroc and Liberation, Islamist paper Attajdid and Socialist daily Al Ittihad Al Ichtaraki, are among the publications which have come out in support of Al Massae.
"It's our right to say, at least once, that we are afraid both for now and the future," said a commentary from the Arabic daily Asshaba.
"Now is more than ever the time for solidarity, because this is about the independence of journalists and the future of a profession which has difficulty holding its ground", Liberation editorialised in a piece titled, "The Press Repressed".
The fine imposed by the Rabat court would also effectively bankrupt the newspaper. "In no way could we give our backing to this verdict. If it is brought to bear, it would lead to Al Massae disappearing from the shelves," wrote Libération.
Publishing director Rachid Nini has said that his paper has made life uncomfortable for several important people in power, so they are trying to put an end to the paper. Nini said the court ruling was "inexplicable and unacceptable" and reflected "a desire to destroy my newspaper and restrict free expression in Morocco".
The Moroccan National Press Union considers the sentence to be exaggerated and far from objective, and is calling for it to be revised. Secretary-General Younes M'jahed said that while "the union is not questioning the right of someone to turn to the courts if they feel they have been wronged," this right should not "put newspapers into liquidation".
The ruling also drew criticism from the press freedom organisation Reporters without Borders (RSF), which said it was "alarmed and scandalised by the exorbitant amount of the record fine on Rachid Nini."
In a statement issued last Thursday, RSF added, "This is not the first time Morocco's courts have acted with a heavy hand. Certain recent court rulings have badly hurt leading Moroccan media and could lead to their disappearance." The organisation urged Moroccan courts to "hand down sentences in proportion to the damages incurred and be careful not to endanger press freedom."
Other groups in Morocco also disagree with the Rabat ruling. Moroccan Human Rights Association member Abdellah Ben Abdessalam said that "the sentence is too harsh, and aims at silencing the free speech which upsets the Moroccan establishment."
Abdelaziz Nouidi, a member of the Justice Association, stated that the verdict is "out of proportion".







najlaa Posted 2008-04-01
Hello Everybody, Of course I am against this verdict. Furthermore, I think that El Massae only publishes the truth. So, why should we not accept this truth? Thank you
jamila bousta Posted 2008-04-02
The ruling against Al Massae depends on the veracity of the news. Libel based on the defamation of people is a crime punishable by law and unacceptable by all international customs. Its punishment should be fair and just, because we are in a Democratic Muslim nation.
Citoyen Posted 2008-04-02
Let’s admit, the fine was heavy. But then, the newspaper, “Al Massae”, was at the origin of the riots in Ksar El Kebir and the witch-hunt against the homosexuals! It was at the origin of the rumour the brought irreparable harm to a city that had no scandals. Morocco is a Muslim country, and “accusing” a citizen or a public person of homosexuality is a criminal act. Morocco has always known how to reconcile modernity with tradition. Ever since this homophobic affair, populism and intolerance have won out. The Western media, which was very critical with regards to Morocco after the arrest of certain alleged homosexuals, has not said anything about this prejudice. This disinformation is shameful.
محمد الشيخ Posted 2008-04-05
Justice is the basis of rule, oh ruler be just, oh press verify the truth before you publish. There are so many topics that can be covered away from libel and defamation of people.
fadwa Posted 2008-04-06
Salam. I hope that the Moroccan associations will stand in front of the oppression of Moroccan institutes because they are still longing for the era of “oppression and humiliation”. So it is high time that they wake up, this is the era of Mohamed 6.
leo Posted 2008-04-10
It is clear how the democracy is going in our country. The moroccan institutions were made to enforce the oppression and humiliation. It is not the first time or will not be the first time the political business conducted this way. we all know the history of our country administration for over 1200 years. So do not talk about justice or freedom of speech.
بيداح baidah agadir inzegan Posted 2008-08-02
The troubles of reporters and journalists are known by everyone. The publication of a scoop is one of the favourable things that contribute in a great way to the prominence of the paper and enhances its credibility towards its readers in following up on breaking up news especially in troubled or sensitive areas. The reader becomes therefore always closely informed about the hidden sides of the news even if it is geographically remote. However, the news scoop cannot be safe from criticism and marginal observations by other media outlets which try hard, from personal jealousy, to insult the scoop in order to fabricate it and devoid it of its content. They achieve this through adopting the principle of "news is sacred but comments are free’. It rushes to deny the news in order to influence this comment. This is considered a total and clear aberrance from professional reason and good sense. There are many and different examples about this. The most recent is the interpretational and fake reading by some papers. However, the troubles of the media scoop aren’t limited to the people of the same house. Finally, however severe are these hectic noises to bury and undermine papers including emerging electronic magazines, reality imposes itself in the end through the increasing popular interest in these electronic magazines and papers in comparison with the fallback and decline in reading of its counterparts.
ghd staighteners Posted 28 days ago
Your article is write very well, I like it very much ~
We welcome your comments on Magharebia's articles.
It is our hope that you will use this forum to interact with other readers across the Maghreb. In order to keep this experience interesting, we ask you to follow the rules outlined in the comments policy. By submitting comments, you are consenting to these rules. While Magharebia.com encourages discussion on all subjects, including sensitive ones, the comments posted are solely the views of those submitting them. Magharebia.com does not necessarily endorse or agree with the ideas, views, or opinions voiced in these comments. This is a moderated forum. Comments deemed abusive, offensive, or those containing profanity may not be published.
Magharebia's Comments Policy